Friday, February 5, 2016

A Dialog is a Dialog, Not A Pep Talk!

In one of the art groups I'm in on Facebook, I tried to start a dialog or conversation or discussion, (take your pick) about a process in creating art. It happened to be an encaustic group, but no matter - I've run into this same problem in other groups. I said I was curious to know how other artists saw the need to have a smooth finished product. For those of you not involved in encaustic work, that means the surface should show no air bubbles or any other marks. One artist put it this way, "It is the Holy Grail of encaustics." Well, let me tell you, it will drive you crazy to try and attain that. Of course if you are doing a textured piece, the question is moot. But back to my problem.

The answers I got at first all were like a pep talk, the responders read into my post that I was cringing at the thought that my art was not perfect, that I needed some back pats, or I needed permission to make my art the way I wanted to. The responses were along the vein of:

It's your artwork, so its done when you say and feel it's done. You will know when a piece is done or not. Trust your instincts!

Stay away from encaustic if your aesthetic is looking for fine neat detail. Identify what it is you are looking for in this work.

Art is exactly what it is and as the artist if the finished product is what you want then it's perfect.

It's your work! Rejoice in it! And for God's sake, don't let someone else tell you how it should look!

Argh! OK, OK, I get all that, but it's not about me. Now lets talk about the question. I posted that I was not looking for a pep talk, just wanted to know other's views on the subject. One or two people finally got it and we exchanged a few sentences.

I don't get much chance to have discussions with other artists because of being housebound most days. And I crave being able to do that. I watch plenty of videos and have books about art mediums I am currently pursuing, but there's no give and take in those.You watch it, or you read it, and there you go - that's it. I try to engage people on my art page on Facebook, but it's been spotty. Maybe if I get enough blog followers, I can have a real dialogue!

Meanwhile, I'll wait and see if anyone else has a viewpoint or if this "dialogue" will die on the vine.

Live Your Life One Day At A Time!

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Truth in Art, and Guernica

Recently I read a post by artist Donald Fox concerning truth in art. His post was mostly a series of questions, with no answers, rather I drew from it that it was an exercise designed to challenge the reader to think about his questions. His final line, "Responsibility lies on both sides of the easel." seemed more to pass on the burden of decision to others, rather than tackle any of the challenges himself. I reread the post and felt it more esoteric than anything else.

However, as I pondered whether this was simply a collection of questions to fill in space, I remembered the town of Guernica. Guernica was the center of Basque life in Spain, considered an important and historical town in its culture. The Basques had always disputed the right of Spain to incorporate them into their country, yet during the Spanish Civil War they had managed to maintain their distance from the conflict. Generalissimo Fransisco Franco determined that the time was right for him to prove that his power over them was absolute. His allies from Germany wanted to test their weaponry from the air and determine just how much terror they could work on helpless people, and Franco gave them carte blanche to do as they wished. This attack was known as a terror bombing, and the assault included 21 German bombers and 3 Italian bombers, all with payloads of different types of bombs. They chose 26 April, 1937 - market day - as the day of the assault. Market Day meant that the people from the surrounding areas would be in town, swelling the normal population from 7,000 to close to 10,000. The defenseless populace had no warning. The waves of bombing utterly destroyed the town and killed many in the process.

When artist Pablo Picasso heard the news he was horrified, and this horror drove him to paint a mural which has attracted world wide fame and the attention of art historians. Picasso had been commissioned to paint a mural in the 1937 World's Fair in Paris. Once he read of the atrocities of Guernica, he abandoned his original plans and instead immediately set about memorializing the tragedy of this terror attack. Driven by his heritage as a Spaniard, and his loathing of war, this mural has become a memorial of the Spanish Civil War worldwide. The painting has attracted much discussion and study, for the composition of the piece, the "hidden" images, the symbolism and the legacy of the mural. Interpretations of Guernica vary widely and and often contradict each other.

So what is the truth of the mural? When pressed to explain the elements in Guernica, Picasso said,
...this bull is a bull and this horse is a horse... If you give a meaning to certain things in my paintings it may be very true, but it is not my idea to give this meaning. What ideas and conclusions you have got I obtained too, but instinctively, unconsciously. I make the painting for the painting. I paint the objects for what they are.
But ever since Guernica was unveiled to the world, the truth of it has varied from source to source. Picasso had his truth, taken from his own experiences as a Spaniard, but in the years since its unveiling, discussions have abounded in what others see, which often go far beyond what Picasso had originally placed in his work of art. It has been the subject of books, thesis papers, scholarly discussions and even televised programs about art.

Going back to the post with which I began then, what is truth? Benjamin Franklin once wrote "Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear." This can apply easily to Guernica. For years, the death tolls reported were abnormally low for such utter destruction, yet as the years passed, governmental papers came to light, from Germany, Russia, Spain and other countries, which moved the death toll starkly upward, from about 124 people to close to 800. To understand the truth of such a painting as Guernica, one needs to delve into study of the matter for oneself. Obviously, the immediate truth is that Picasso sought to put down what he viewed as an atrocity. After that, the truth becomes what others interpret as they view the work, and understand the history.

So, I do not believe that it is an easy matter to find truth in art, and yet it can be the easiest way to illustrate truth. Art, then, has the ability to present itself as different things to different people. Perhaps Donald Fox's last statement holds more importance than any other in his post about truth in art.

As a postscript, I can recommend the book GuernicaA Novel by Dave Boling. It is extremely well researched and well written, and is a compelling read.

Enjoy your life one day at a time.